1/ Guys, if I RT a guy saying "X is probably Y" and critique his use of "probably" for expressing an intuition and zero ACTUAL DATA, the smart move for you is NOT to assert that "X is Z" while supplying ZERO ACTUAL DATA. I don't care about your hunches / received wisdom.
-
-
4/ If you're just repeating what you've heard from Rogan or Mangan or something, then your statements aren't even really about science, they're about tribal signalling / mood affiliation / alliance building. Which is boring AF
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
GP u suk *offers no evidence or support for my proposition*
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.