1/ Guys, if I RT a guy saying "X is probably Y" and critique his use of "probably" for expressing an intuition and zero ACTUAL DATA, the smart move for you is NOT to assert that "X is Z" while supplying ZERO ACTUAL DATA. I don't care about your hunches / received wisdom.
-
-
3/ low quality data with n=1 & bad p values is actually ok if you've done some sort of
@gwern style self-hack experiment and have data on 30 days of eating sugar vs 30 days of not, ok, that's interesting stuff! but repeating a conclusion that you MAYBE heard from Joe Rogan...Show this thread -
4/ If you're just repeating what you've heard from Rogan or Mangan or something, then your statements aren't even really about science, they're about tribal signalling / mood affiliation / alliance building. Which is boring AF
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.