2/ that was purchased from someone else, that was subdivided from a larger tract, that was purchased from someone else, that was opened up for homesteading by the federal government ... AFTER IT KILLED OFF THE INDIANS AND TOOK IT. And if that's not the EXACT land history,
-
-
13/ So, let us imagine that, before you bought YOUR house, maybe 10 or 110 years ago, the state government said "we are taking this lake from Bill, paying him, and then associating the right to swim in this lake with the title of each of the nearest 100 houses".
Show this thread -
14/ So, in this example, when you buy your house you're buying * 1 acre of land * 1 house * minus gas rights (bc, perhaps, those were sold off) * plus an easement over property X * plus guaranteed access to lake Y
Show this thread -
15/ You understand and agree that this is how property works in the US and under Anglo American law, yes?
Show this thread -
16/ So in this example, let us presume that neighbor Z, who owns the property over which your driveway runs (because of the easement) asks the town for permission to build a wall blocking your driveway. The town says "yep, looks good!" You, as a good libertarian >>>
Show this thread -
17/ DEFEND your neighbor's right to build a wall that blocks the easement that you own, yes? It doesn't matter that that easement was factored into the purchase price of your house. Your house WAS worth $400k and is now worth $300k, but that's OK because LIBERTARIAN
Show this thread -
18/ And let us next imagine that another neighbor, who is closer to lake than you, asks the town for permission to build a building across the boat ramp. The boat ramp that you have access to because of a redistribution of property rights 110 years ago. Once again you are cool
Show this thread -
19/ Now, to make these examples a bit closer to the actual zoning case, imagine that in 1923 the town passed a zoning law saying "we declare this a resiidential zone ; none of these 500 houses may build a shopping mall or a steel mill". You had two small rights peeled off of
Show this thread -
20/ your bundle of property rights, and 1,000 new small ones added to the bundle: you can be guaranteed that neighbor Z will never build a steel mill and ruin your views or air. And you paid for this, in a sense, by losing your own right, via this mutual "contract" of sorts.
Show this thread -
21/ So, that's the bundle of property rights that you purchased. And you learn, today, that the town has approved your neighbor's plans to build a steel mill...about 18 feet off the property line, and 32 feet off the road. Your curb appeal takes a bit of a hit!
Show this thread -
22/ ...and your property rights were violated. BUT BECAUSE YOU ARE A LIBERTARIAN, you say "the government is good, I love the government, anything the government does is wonderful, THIS IS FINE". yes?
Show this thread -
23/ So, in my case, I purchased this farm 6 years ago. I read the zoning law, start to finish, 7 years ago - before I made a purchase offer on the farm. I learned at that point in time that the bundle of property I was bidding on included:
Show this thread -
24/ * 12 acres of pasture * 40 acres of forest * 1 house * 1 barn * 1 pond * the guarantee that no buildings would be built within 30 feet of my land or within 50 feet of the road * MINUS the right to build within 30 feet of MY property line and that's what I purchased.
Show this thread -
25/ But then a GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL decided to remove one of those pieces of property from me, without due process (5A, 14A violation) and without just compensation (5A violation). And your argument is: as a libertarian, I should ignore this.
Show this thread -
26/ This is an extremely good rebuttal
@EricChr15868637 https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1216868827046318080 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
27/ I'm not sure what a "personally written contract" means. Explain, please? I do, in fact, have a contract with the town. That contract is the zoning code plus the state laws that insists that it be applied correctly and with due process. https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1216867689274265600 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
Show this thread
-
29/ It's not a "Home Depot do-it-yourself shed". It's a ~25 foot tall, 2,500 square foot ground footprint, up to 5,000 square foot internal layout (bc 2nd floor) industrial steel building located 18' feet off my property line. https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1216865588427087873 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
30/ Dude has almost 2 acres of land, could have put it anywhere he wanted ... but chose - because town violated the law and said he could - to put it WAY up in one corner.
Show this thread -
31/
@EricChr15868637 so you seem to suggest that inconvenience don't real, but quantifiable cash damages do, yes? So if the government violates the law and causes a decline in property values, is that a taking? https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1216870130703126528 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
32/ Exactly. Many software engineers never grasp pointers, or meta programming. Many libertarians never grasp Kegan levels beyond 2, or stable markets, or any property more abstract than a toothbrush or a gold coin.https://twitter.com/JasonTrippet/status/1216872128982609920 …
Show this thread -
33/ Did the vegan sue her neighbor? Or did the vegan sue the town? Was the vegan suing a government employee for violating the law? Call me silly, but as an ACTUAL LIBERTARIAN, I think suing government officials for malfeasance is kinda cool. https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1216872168929267713 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
34/ explain things in big words, and he can't follow patiently explain things slowly and https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1216869837537935360 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
35/ anyway, I think I've made my point I want to leave you all with
@EricChr15868637 's awesome rebuttal (a second time) Gold, Eric. Gold. https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1216868827046318080 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
36/ Why is "farm" in scare quotes here,
@EricChr15868637 ? It's a hobby farm, yes, but it's a farm. I raise almost all of my own meat, butcher my own pigs, make pies from the fruit from my orchard, etc. How much of your meat do you raise? https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1217003745533448192 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
37/ > the town already gave the guy permission except there is an appeals process to overturn incorrect / illegal decisions by town employees who break the law > It is not going to get torn down. except there is an explicit process for that too https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1217003745533448192 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Show this thread -
40/ 1) concur, software engineering is my main source of income. Followed by writing. Farming is a hobby, as I've said many times. 2) fines for illegal construction are $275/day until it's torn down http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXIV/676/676-17.htm … https://twitter.com/EricChr15868637/status/1217205168598634497 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
41/ but the rule that says that the courts can force a building to be torn down is not RSA 676:17, but RSA 676:15, here http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXIV/676/676-15.htm …
@EricChr15868637Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.