really fucking wild that I was raised in a family that thinks of prenups as "planning for divorce" and a strong signal that the couple doesn't love one another
-
-
Strongly considering one that provides zero assets to a party filing for a no-fault divorce.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
that's fair! the "really fucking wild" bit was mostly bafflement at the contrast between my upbringing vs how they're talked about in my peer group seems fine to me if a couple forgoes a prenup with the intent of strengthening commitment, too
-
someone in the replies mentioned getting one that leaves no assets to the party who files no-fault this also strikes me as reasonable
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i dont think this one is going to contain such marginal incentives apart from "guess we are marginally less likely to have a life-destroying battle over assets in the event" and also . . .
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
The cold calculation is its your plan for a worst case scenario while you're happy and on speaking terms, put in writing in a binding fashion so neither can screw the other if it happens. Get it drafted and signed, then leave it with your lawyer(s) and never think of it again.
-
You are setting up a dangerous situation if you think both sides will be on good enough terms to "hash things out" fairly at the end. Courts/lawyers are expensive Especially if one side owns all/large part of successful business. Bezos learned this the brutally hard way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.