"sex with multiples is like cheese...now you understand poly" oh poly is a facile argument made by 110 IQ brights ignorant of Chesterton's fence, evolutionary biology, research on oxytocin, David Friedman / Byrne Hobart thoughts on game theory, commitment, trust & contract law? https://twitter.com/anapsid/status/1201730823843696640 …
-
-
9/ Whether a binding contract has been signed. And, not that my wife would - in a million years - look elsewhere, but she knew when we first started dating this Morlock Brand addendum to the standard boilerplate. https://twitter.com/lunavis/status/1201883442411126785 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
10/ I might be confused, and it could be his father, Milton Friedman. And it's not on poly so much as on the utility of specialization to learn one spouse's utility function and deliver that product. No cite at hand, but I definitely read it.https://twitter.com/ANiculitcheff/status/1201960360716185603 …
Show this thread -
11/ not my ONLY answer; just my best onehttps://twitter.com/yashkaf/status/1201984390135500800 …
Show this thread -
12/ No, I'm not. I know of Patri, and how he was poly, and how it ended in divorce. I'm definitely talking about Milton or David. https://twitter.com/favoredprisoner/status/1202189853724536832?s=19 …https://twitter.com/favoredprisoner/status/1202189853724536832?s=19 …
Show this thread -
13/ I've seen poly "work" a few times in former case - which seems far worse than it not working. I subscribe to
@Spivonomist 's concept or codification of "euvoluntary trade", specifically (6) neither party coerced by circumstance; the disparity in BATNAs is not "too large"https://twitter.com/FamishedDragon/status/1202317591332569088 …Show this thread -
14/ Maybe it also works in non-coercive situations ; I've got a few friends / acquaintances who say that they seem to be wired for it, and I have no reason to doubt them. So I'm talking specifically about the "coercion" subset of "works" here.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
no kidding! and just think of how dumb REALLY smart people can be!
-
But enough about Isaac Asimov.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.