except, reading one paragraph into the article, this is not about charging the public to read the law, but to read PRIVATELY CREATED ANNOTATIONS of the law so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯https://twitter.com/radleybalko/status/1201614783935586304 …
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP
They aren’t private if those annotations carry the state’s imprimatur.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @radleybalko
do they, though? article says this: > But the annotations, which includes things like commentaries, case notations, and editor’s notes, don’t have the force of law. RBG's question in the next paragraph gets to the exact point I'm making, and I don't see any response to that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
> If they are private, and the state doesn’t provide a way to get the text of the law without the annotations I see no evidence to support the second branch of the "if"
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
no, this is incorrect
2:04 PM - 2 Dec 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.