except, reading one paragraph into the article, this is not about charging the public to read the law, but to read PRIVATELY CREATED ANNOTATIONS of the law so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯https://twitter.com/radleybalko/status/1201614783935586304 …
> If they are private, and the state doesn’t provide a way to get the text of the law without the annotations I see no evidence to support the second branch of the "if"
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That is absolutely incorrect. The state and publisher have always provided a way to obtain the text of the law without purchasing the annotations. They are public records, not copyrightable, freely distributed, and publishable by anyone. This has been stipulated in every filing.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.