They aren’t private if those annotations carry the state’s imprimatur.
-
-
-
do they, though? article says this: > But the annotations, which includes things like commentaries, case notations, and editor’s notes, don’t have the force of law. RBG's question in the next paragraph gets to the exact point I'm making, and I don't see any response to that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I give this dog a thumbs up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They're not exactly privately created annotations. The annotations were created by the state, not by a private entity, which is why the state claims copyright (the work was performed by private parties under contract to the state). This is the crux of the case.
-
Search my TL for "malamud" to learn more.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The reason this is an issue is because some of the annotations are simply page numbers. And then in the official laws they make reference to those page numbers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.