We probably have rather different mental pictures of what transpired in the situation the OP was complaining about. You're probably picturing it much worse than it was, I'm probably picturing it much better than it was. +
-
-
and your EXACT PROPOSAL was "don't like it? go somewhere else" BUT THEN YOU ARGUED THAT EVERY PLACE IN THAT PRICE TIER GETS TO CONVERGE ON YOUR NORMS so you're doing the jetski thing - the only way to live on the water and not hear jetskis is be a billionaire and own the lake
-
an appreciation of the fact that norms differ and this is a tricky problem, as opposed to "anyone who doesn't like the sound of jetskis and screaming grandmothers obviously hates joy and SHOULD BE DRIVEN OUT OF EVERY PUBLIC PLACE" would be good
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"no property rights" Couldn't this be solved if restaurant owners were willing to set standards below the $100/plate tier? Why aren't they?
-
Because crisp definitions are hard, violations are rare, and civil society polices itself (I once asked two people who were ignoring their screaming child at Chili's to please take him outside)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.