I don't have to guess, you have a knowledge job (G) that requires you to commit code on the regular, rather than manage people. G3
-
-
Replying to @djinnius @eigenrobot
so do I but I've got an argument for why I'm G2 ; thoughts ? (plz feel free to argue against ; I don't care what class I'm in but just want to sharpen the dissecting knife)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @djinnius @eigenrobot
could and did for 15 years, but not over the last 3 or 4
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot
I think the Church criteria for differentiating G2 and G3 aren't great, and exist mostly so he can call himself G2 As a freelancer you have considerable autonomy, and can fire *clients* which is comparable
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @djinnius @eigenrobot
also, I'd suggest that a scale (logorithmic ?) of how long one can go without income is important idle rich = lifetime very well off = 1-2 years decently well off = 6 months ?? = 1 month paycheck-to-paycheck = 0 folks with a successful startup exit get many points here
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
indeed; was heading in that very direction many cases of doctors or lawyers with $500k/yr incomes living paycheck to paycheck, etc
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
referring to anyone who works for a living (rather than owning for a living) as "Gentry" is already considerable status inflation tbh
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I think that "yeoman" is a better term, fwiw
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.