1/ Had a conversation with a family member that made me sad. He's the president of his condo board, and is - it seems - violating the condo bylaws by appointing person X to role Y, when the regs say that he may appoint a condo owner...and he's appointed a tenant (non owner).
-
-
4/ "Yeah, but we're saying back that this is INCLUSIVE of my powers. I can appoint an owner...but that doesn't mean I can't appoint a non owner!" Sigh. So...you think that it is implicit that you can appoint a resident of Beijing, a guy who lives in Texas, or a guy across town
Show this thread -
5/ ...and the establishing documents were written with a point of view where all of that was obvious to everyone, but the founders were worried that folks might NOT think that the president can appoint people who own condos, so they made sure to include THAT class explicitly
Show this thread -
6/ Basically, my relative is like my town zoning board. HE KNOWS WHAT HE WANTS TO DO, AND HE WILL MISCONSTRUE THE DOCUMENTS IN ANY CONTORTED READING AS IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A FIG LEAF
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
"Rules are made to be broken"? "Rules are for the little people"? "A tenant is the Same Thing as an owner"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.