1/ ooooh this is a fascinating question!https://twitter.com/mitdasein/status/1175567299840839680 …
-
-
4/ certainly challenges Rush's "ok, there are two parts of the human brain, logic and emotion, but they have to work together if they want to fly a starship to a distant black hole" for esoteric weirdness. ...but NS falls down a bit on technical virtuousity.
Show this thread -
5/ I mean, NS CAN absolutely do technical virtuousity. He did all the time back in Snowcrash days. But now he doesn't bother. "Not bothering because ok is good enough" is very un-Prog rock.
Show this thread -
6/ Gene Wolfe does genre bending all the time. And he does technical virtuousity. And he's inspired by the classics (just look at his language in Claw of the Concilliator, etc !). And Swanwick is basically the popular, easier to read Gene Wolfe.
Show this thread -
7/ Excellent point! Yes, I'm totally familiar that MM was involved in Hawkwind.https://twitter.com/epobirs/status/1175874422420279311 …
Show this thread -
8/ > And Swanwick is basically the popular, easier to read Gene Wolfe. and to be clear, that's not a dis on Swanwick. I prefer Swanwick to Wolfe, the same way I prefer Rush to, say, I don't know, Camel, or Porcupine Tree, or whatever
Show this thread -
9/ Worthy answer! TCB is actually the only non genre author I bother to read these days. Hmm...will think on this. (Btw, a fun easy intro to TCB is Drop City Blues. Highly recommended.)https://twitter.com/spongeworthy2/status/1175879957236584449 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.