5/ YES YES Finally a smart take in this thread. Thank you. https://twitter.com/s_pitchfork/status/1174743809877565440 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
6/ "Should" is an idiot word, 99.99% of the time. If you had the power to do X, you'd do X. Since you don't, you don't. "I wish that X" is a fine sentence. "He / she / it should do X" is just an expression of powerlessness. Oh, they should? OK, make them. You can't? I see.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted ThunderB
7/ First, the Geneva Conventions (plural, there are more than one) do not apply not because they hide among civilians, but because they are not signatories to the Geneva Conventions. Second, one should read the Geneva Conventions. They're interesting.https://twitter.com/ThunderB/status/1174744272387678208 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
4 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
8/ OK, I'm taking a twitter break for a few hours. The takes are too stupid today.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
9/ Those numbers have footnotes. Did you click them? I did. They lead to reports. Did you read or skim them? I did. https://twitter.com/AdamKarnes/status/1174747053634674688 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
10/ Would I bet a trillion dollars the numbers are perfect? Of course not. But "LOL, your Taliban numbers are conflated w civilian numbers" when they're not, followed by rapid backpedalling to "well, LOL, wikipedia" is !@#-ing retarded. Lobbing ad hoc pot shots is retarded.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
11/ I said that the US War in Afghanistan is stupid and immoral because we've killed about 10x the number of civilians there that we killed here by A̶f̶g̶h̶a̶n̶i̶ Saudi terrorists. The responses are "yeah but wikipedia LOL". Non-serious bush league nonsense.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread -
12/ A proper rebuttal would be to explain why the war is good despite us killing 30,000 civilians, or to explain that the war was good because we'd actually killed only 280 civilians based on figures found at LINK. So far people have just sniped with random crap like >>
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
13/ "well, they should come out into the open so we can kill them fairly". It's all just emotional flailing because of, I presume, cognitive dissonance between (a) "we're the good guys / they're the bad guys" and (b) "ooh, those numbers are damning".
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
14/ First off, I don't believe you. Maybe I'm wrong, but the kind of guy who says "LOL wikipedia" isn't the kind of guy who clicks footnotes. If you had, I'd expect "LOL, this links to a report from XYZ who's a flake". Second >>> https://twitter.com/AdamKarnes/status/1174749573631205376 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread
15/ I'm not asking you to give "special weight" (your words) to the report. I cited numbers. You said "LOL". Do you have better numbers, or are you going to just LOL at any facts that don't align with your favored policy?
-
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
16/ good meme https://twitter.com/jabocka/status/1174750797948694531 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted
17/ Of course that's what they're doing. They've got a retarded conception that either a) American good, Taliban bad b) America bad, Taliban good and they're [ stupidly ] mapping what I AM saying to a thing I'm NOT saying, then fighting the strawman https://twitter.com/TheAgeofShoddy/status/1174753294457008128 …
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.