My thoughts on SF & Fantasy: * There are dozens of genres and sub genres in a big messy Venn diagram * pulp exists * sword-and-planet-exists * Hard SF, new wave, blah blah blah all exist * and they're all good * SF and F overlap at the margins * neither is a subset of the other
-
-
8/ They're all good. But they're not all the same. And there isn't one top level category or grouping. There are two. We've known this for a century or more. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magazine_of_Fantasy_%26_Science_Fiction …pic.twitter.com/hKIvqYQcOE
Show this thread -
9/ Rock on, sword-and-planet authors and fans. Rock on, pulp rev authors and fans. Rock on, hard SF authors and fans. All the genres and sub genres are good. ...but Fantasy isn't Science Fiction. Anyone who actually LIVES in this neighborhood could tell you that.
Show this thread -
10/ The top level category, if there is one, is "speculative". Almost no one uses that term, but it's there if you care to. One decent Venn diagram among many (via https://annieneugebauer.com/2014/03/24/what-is-speculative-fiction/ …). We can quibble about details, but it gestures in the right direction.pic.twitter.com/nK65LN2ufP
Show this thread -
11/ this is an amazing thread every single sentence in it is wrong one random example: >
@robkroese and@MorlockP think space Opera and sword and planet aren't science fiction. WHAT? https://t.co/jtMm63j7woThis Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Physics as a means of intoxication?
-
wave-particle duality will really bake your noodle
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.