I disagree with both of these points. - you can absolutely explain evolution without explaining origin - you can hypothesize about origins without needing to know if it happened once or a thousand times But, yes, Dawkins is boring.
sure, but that's not your original claim you said > You can’t explain how life evolves, without first explaining its origins. I claim you can. You can explain how it was created without explaining how it evolved later. You can explain how it evolved later without explaini >