When you see a statement you dislike, you DISPROVE IT with data. You don't clutch your pearls and declare that you're outraged. That's an SJW tactic. If Salon is wrong about cops, prove it. https://twitter.com/ArthurSchwartz/status/1169572991010824199 …
-
-
3/ As I already said, the original claimant provided data. If you want to argue, provide more or better data. https://twitter.com/CosmicLunchLady/status/1169581371729297408?s=19 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One article is an anecdote. Not data
-
If you’re contending she meant only the two cops in the case in question, you’re correct If she is referring to all NY cops, he is correct. IMO Her statement is a gross generalizationpic.twitter.com/BhyhOqtAmF
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Original claimant provided a link to datum. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
-
> Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Just because Carl Sagan said it doesn't make it a law.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.