very weird defense of group think / single consensus (RTed via @greatdismal, @amendlocke )
Personally I think that more IT -> more partitioning of the consensus is a GOOD thing
Different cultures is GOOD
Exit is GOOD
Aren't we told by our betters that diversity is strength?https://twitter.com/MCSpaceCadet/status/1167130412453285888 …
-
-
4/ If I were a citizen of the Soviet Union in 1950 and denied the * consensus * scientific assertion that Lysenokism was true, would that be bad, because I'm undercutting the consensus reality?
Show this thread -
5/ You're moving goal posts. Your initial tweet said IT enabling lots of opinions was bad because it denied consensus reality...without regard to whether the consensus is correct or not. Now you're ret-conning that to "possibility of consensus". Odd.
https://twitter.com/MCSpaceCadet/status/1167213426654863360?s=19 …Show this thread -
6/ Seems plausible.
https://twitter.com/JeanPaulZodeaux/status/1167219044014931973?s=19 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.