this is an argument much like min wage: that it's BETTER for poor people to not be allowed to get X at all (where X is "a job" or "a lawyer") unless it can get one that meets some 3rd party's standard
I'm sympathetic to @WhippleMarc's desire to make a living, but not this arghttps://twitter.com/WhippleMarc/status/1166189576546848768 …
-
-
What started this whole rant was the fact that such policies *are* being implemented - for example, due to intensive lobbying from
#a2J advocates, sometimes astroturfed and sometimes not, rules against non-lawyers participating in the system are being relaxed. -
so then the response to me defending such proposals should not be "so run for congress and pass such laws", but should instead be "it's already happening, you should be happy", no ?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.