The problem is that in fact sex is not like buying a cheese along a few important axes, and you can't just toss deontology and immediately start screaming no gods no masters I mean you can and I kind of respect that but it comes with some problems
-
Show this thread
-
In this specific case, the issue is it seems to me that sex is an ekstatic state spelled with a k so that you know im serious about the greek etymology
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
The thing that prompted this entire line of thought was that dumb patriarchy museum or whatever it was There was a class of (fourth?) graders going through and in particular one piece was an older fairly obese naked lady just standing there The kids looked really uncomfortable
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
and that makes total sense to me, and I was fortunately able to make legible to myself the nature of my objection it's certainly not the exhibit in isolation; I can see it nicely riffing on Celle qui fut la belle heaulmière, frinstance
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Rather--and maybe this isn't quite as crisp as I'd like--the caricatured left position seems to end up in a place like this, in an uncomfortable aughtistic tangle "By our theory sex and nudity should be mundane human behavior, and by God we will act as if they are so"
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
For most people, sex is not mundane; it is ecstatic. You can build whatever systems you like to contradict this, and I expect in the long run you will have all the fortune of King Pentheus.
3 replies 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
Hmm so there's a desacralisation or profanation angle to this, maybe?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
yeah I think that's a succinct way of putting it
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
So: "the left tries to desacrilize and that will never work. The right tries to ...prevent monkeys from following monkey urges, and that will never work" ?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Hm! Maybe? I don't quite know whether I can effectively critique a non-caricatured socialcon position because I'm so far removed from it culturally
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
well, I'm smack dab in the middle of it (as a true believer) and here's my steelman of it / steelman of the critique: * socialcons are correct that 1 marriage / 1 sex partner / (relatively) early marriage and family formation lead to the highest achievable human flourishing but
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP @eigenrobot and
2/ this leads a massive gap between puberty (~ age 13 ?) and age-of-best-family-formation (~ age 27 ?), and 99% of people will not / can not navigate those 14 years well, so there is a massive ideal vs achievability gappic.twitter.com/ctX6PCR01h
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Seen a lot of people shipwrecked on those rocks and it could have turned out a lot worse for me
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.