Gun crime liability makes as much sense as auto accident liability. Yes, it is a bit of a bias against guns to required it only for crimes with guns, and not to require insurance re crimes more generally.https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/san-jose-mayor-proposes-first-of-its-kind-ordinance-mandating-liability-insurance-for-gun-owners/ …
-
-
Sure, I'd like to see such things as well. But it is a someone separate issue.
-
concur; a self-admitted tangent
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.