You described a somewhat idealized feudal system, but you didn't answer the main question is why do you think so. You have said you think that's the system that most people will thrive under, but that's a naked assertion, you haven't advanced arguments why that should be so. 1/n
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
There are at least three issues here. One is whether people would be happy (= live fulfilling lives, self-actualize, etc.) under such a system. Since absolute estimates are hard we should compare it to other ways of organizing society 2/n
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The second issue is that this description is normative, of what *should* be. What you'll get in reality will necessarily be somewhat different, maybe a lot different. Will you be able to get close (and stay close) to that ideal? 3/n
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The third issue is survivability. Your society is stable and so stagnant. Will it get eaten by more chaotic and (maybe temporarily) more powerful neighbors? Historically feudal societies didn't do too well against capitalist ones. 4/fin
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
EXCELLENT point
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.