-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MattTGrant @ngvrnd
his mother in law died and his wife got an inheritance this has been debunked time and against for over a decade
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Sounds less like this has been debunked - you literally acknowledge that the increase in net worth took place - than that the implication of nefarious self-dealing is, at least in this case, unwarranted.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MattTGrant @ngvrnd
no, it has literally been debunked this is a quote: > How does a senator earning $193,400 a year increase their net worth by nearly $2.4 million a year, every year for a decade? That DID NOT happen; it was a one time bump, not "every year for a decade".
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @MattTGrant
Not so much debunked as "explained in such a way as to dispel suspicion"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ngvrnd @MattTGrant
no, debunked original quote: > How does a senator earning $193,400 a year increase their net worth by nearly $2.4 million a year, this is false / this did not happen
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
since that "original quote" is phrased as a question, it can't be debunked or even declared false, although it is undeniably tendentious. The net worth figure, which the Washington Post put at $22M in 2014 could be disputed (I've seen it set as high as $27M).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Disagree. If I ask "how is it that the sun rises in the North?" that is (a) a statement of fact, wrapped with (b) a question querying the mechanism of that fact.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.