You can’t understand *anyone* who doesn’t question *everything?* Maybe other people are both more humble about their reasoning ability, and more grateful that hundreds or thousands of years of human practical experience supplies answers where individual abstract reasoning fails. https://twitter.com/fmanjoo/status/1149767779270062080 …
-
-
but also agree with
@St_Rev , for a distinct yet overlapping set of people common tool wielded by different people for different reasons ...but reasons mostly end up (as they usually do) with hedonism or power ...but I repeat myself.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Question legitimacy of gov sufficiently and it becomes clear that reverting the definition of marriage to religions and renaming the gov-provided set of tax breaks and etc. to something generic makes way more sense. But "civil partnerships for whoever!" isn't a catchy slogan
-
This has always been my thought re gay marriage. Make a new form of corporation: in addition to C and S, make M. Allow 1 man & 1 woman, 2 men, 3 people, whatever, to form one, for tax and inheritance purposes. ...but that doesn't create culture war red meat.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.