2/ Yes, Imperial Japan was absolutely an aggressor, and very bad. ...which is entirely distinct from "was the Japanese attack on the US a 'sneak attack' or legitimate?" which is the only topic I weighed in on.https://twitter.com/Cosmoloneli/status/1142115922456412162 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/ No, this is false. Japan began WWII in 1937 with the Marco Polo Bridge incident. (earlier if you look at abrogation of battleship treaty). US started trade sanctions in 1940. https://twitter.com/AetiusReforged/status/1142117651256348673 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
4/ wrong: my teacher taught me that X was the good team & did nothing wrong also wrong: teachers suck; Y was actually good also wrong: !@# you conspiracy theorists, ACTUALLY X was good right: both teachers and conspiracy websites feed you simplified pablum, all sides are bad
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fair enough. Thank you for this newfound knowledge. Though, it is unfortunate that the government would restrict information like this in history textbooks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, conflating "FDR planned for" with "FDR wanted" with "US wanted" is a basic mistake.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.