It's not about pretending that there is equality of ability. It's about declaring and enforcing an equality of dignity & under law, because every system that has ever enforced such distinctions has produced vastly more injustice than a system that does not.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jkrwld
It's easy to misinterpret "high potential can be found everywhere" - a sentiment dating back at least to Gray's "Elegy" - as "people's abilities are in fact equal and it is only prejudice that makes them seem unequal."
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @rebelcinder @jkrwld
It's important to be humble about one's own, contingent ideas about signifiers of ability. My own understanding may be limited by my own upbringing and experiences. But that doesn't make the signified level of ability equal across all adults.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rebelcinder @jkrwld
So, for example, I can both be skeptical that an Ivy League degree on a resume is an unambiguous signifier of ability, and, all things equal, prefer that my kids go to a prestigious college over a less prestigious college.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rebelcinder @jkrwld
> I can both be skeptical that an Ivy League degree on a resume is an unambiguous signifier of ability, well, certainly, given affirmative action! </troll !!!!!!!!!!!>
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Legacy admissions?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rebelcinder @jkrwld
no one in this house is named Chad Northwick the IVth ; I'm against all of it !
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Affirmative action can identify high-potential people who have experienced more genuine adversity than typical admits. Handled stupidly, it can encourage admission officers to admit an African princeling over a kid from Bed-Stuy achieving against the odds.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Concur. And I'd replace "Handled stupidly" with "Handled ideologically" - ideological is often a kind of stupid. I suggest that that's the norm.
-
-
Well, in this kind of case, it's that what's getting measured rewards the administrator for considering skin color without regard to life circumstances. But skin color still presents meaningful adversity within US society in most cases.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.