I agree that there are no huge conspiracies, but this argument is bad / uses bad data. Let's pretend the Moon landing was a hoax. It's not 411,000 people who have to keep the secret. We presume most of Apollo was real. Saturn V really built. LEM actually designed. etc. >> https://twitter.com/drg1985/status/1137708774976905221 …
-
-
5/ If you held a gun to my head and made me come up with the best possible argument for "Apollo was a hoax", it would be "it 90% worked, but we were under time pressure vs Soviets so fudged the last 10% as deadline approached". https://twitter.com/gdsimms/status/1137730451164938241 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread -
6/ So in this "best possible argument", maybe everything worked except 3rd stage relight for translunar injection, and LEM and command module circled Earth for an extra week then came back. ~2,000 people in on it.
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, even if a conclusion is likely correct (ie these conspiracies being highly unlikely), how you came to those conclusions is important and shows whether you are to be taken seriously or not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.