1/ When I encounter opinions like this IRL I usually just ask "what part of it did you disagree with? what poorly reasoned argument did he make?" https://twitter.com/rachelbovard/status/1133401923552288768 …
-
-
3/ "OK. But you said that the study was flawed / the legal reasoning was stupid. What was the flaw in the study? How was the legal reasoning stupid?" This goes a few rounds until they admit that they never read the study or the SCOTUS brief or whatever.
Show this thread -
4/ I'm unsure if this Socratic dialogue has ever taught a single one of them anything. ...but I keep trying.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.