> How is this OK? /shrug has a human ever driven straight into something at 68 mph? how is THAT ok? Questions must always be formulated "...compared to WHAT alternative?"https://twitter.com/neilcybart/status/1129324705209552896 …
-
-
4/ Providing hard data to rebut your factless pronouncements from-on-high is "trollish" ? Sorry, your lordship. Won't happen again, your lordship. <tugs fetlock>https://twitter.com/neilcybart/status/1129445972101275649 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AND Autopilot is ostensibly improving year over year whereas human drivers are quite certainty NOT improving.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
never bring data to a signalling fight
-
How do the numbers look if you adjust for the type of miles in which Autopilot is usually engaged, which if I understand it correctly is mostly highway driving? Haven't checked; my guess is that human crash incidence per highway mile driven is lower than per total mile driven.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Exhibit 5,637 in why giving everyone a voice was a mistake. Emotion is great, it's also absolutely terrible when not controlled. And it just seems like the loudest voices are driven by the most senseless of emotions
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nice try, but it doesn’t matter. We are awful at analyzing data and recognizing danger.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Excuse you. Your tweets are unnecessary and do little to support your perspective / position on this issue. Instead, it's just trollish behavior.
-
It’s literally the opposite of everything you just said.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.