> How is this OK? /shrug has a human ever driven straight into something at 68 mph? how is THAT ok? Questions must always be formulated "...compared to WHAT alternative?"https://twitter.com/neilcybart/status/1129324705209552896 …
-
-
3/ Here's the data that
@neilcybart is ignoring: * 1 per 3.34 million miles driven in which drivers had Autopilot engaged * 1 accident per 1.92 million miles human driven. At 20 million miles/day@neilcybart is arguing for an 1,600 additional crashes per year. Genius.Show this thread -
4/ Providing hard data to rebut your factless pronouncements from-on-high is "trollish" ? Sorry, your lordship. Won't happen again, your lordship. <tugs fetlock>https://twitter.com/neilcybart/status/1129445972101275649 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
autopilot as it currently exists can't replace a driver, just assists them and this is unlikely to change, esp. for intensive practical applications like trucking, anytime soon
End of conversation
-
-
-
Isn't there a formal fallacy for when someone argues against something by holding it up to the standard of (effectively) perfection rather than the existing standard, or even acknowledging the existing standard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I remember this crash, but some new details in that article are...odd.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.