I find it odd to call remarks "outrageous". This sounds like a testable hypothesis. Why, post-Enlightenment, would anyone ever choose to take the Dark Age path of being outraged when they can instead gather data and test a hypothesis? Sad. https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1115926643799932929 …
-
-
12/
@michaelbd nails him as wellhttps://twitter.com/michaelbd/status/1116053171682643969 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
BUT MUH DOG WHISTLE!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given how many controversies have gotten people fired and later turned out to be totally misinterpreted, or even the wrong person, why haven't employers mandated a 30 day wait between any Internet outrage, regardless of the apparent facts, and termination?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.