I find it odd to call remarks "outrageous". This sounds like a testable hypothesis. Why, post-Enlightenment, would anyone ever choose to take the Dark Age path of being outraged when they can instead gather data and test a hypothesis? Sad. https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1115926643799932929 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs Retweeted ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs
ⓘ Dogs don't have thumbs added,
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
> The rhetorical advantage is so slight that we disagree
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
who's buying it? me? No. I was framing thing in their own terms. Anyway, we disagree.
8:54 AM - 10 Apr 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.