I find it odd to call remarks "outrageous". This sounds like a testable hypothesis. Why, post-Enlightenment, would anyone ever choose to take the Dark Age path of being outraged when they can instead gather data and test a hypothesis? Sad. https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1115926643799932929 …
-
-
am glad to hear that "
@jkbloodtreasure in particular has banged on for years about Chinese state indoctrination" ; that's great. I'm not accusing him of being pro indoctrination; I'm asking if there's a way for potential allies on this topic from the right to express solidarity.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I know, I know, but you've just wandered into a bit of Brit left banter about what is undoubtedly a wind-up by Scruton. We know him of old (I've read him off and on since the 1980s).
-
Well, as I said to
@_HelenDale elsewhere, I've never heard of Scuton before today...but I do dislike selective edits & games of telephone. It's bad when the American left does it, bad when the American right does it (and I criticize both) ...but, also, there is a place for bantz
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.