I find it odd to call remarks "outrageous". This sounds like a testable hypothesis. Why, post-Enlightenment, would anyone ever choose to take the Dark Age path of being outraged when they can instead gather data and test a hypothesis? Sad. https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1115926643799932929 …
-
-
And, tact #2 on this: if the case against his stance is so strong, why was it necessary to massage the quote by deleting 2/3 of it and capitalizing a word to hide the edit? Deception seems like a strategy of weakness, not strength.pic.twitter.com/396NDYi7vJ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think this is what's going on here (
@jkbloodtreasure in particular has banged on for years about Chinese state indoctrination) but by all means have your fun. -
I'm not trying to have fun, I'm asking serious questions about epistemic bubbles, and if there is a way for people on the right to express certain thoughts in ways that won't be discounted on the left. I am looking for an answer, not trying to score points.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.