I find it odd to call remarks "outrageous". This sounds like a testable hypothesis. Why, post-Enlightenment, would anyone ever choose to take the Dark Age path of being outraged when they can instead gather data and test a hypothesis? Sad. https://twitter.com/georgeeaton/status/1115926643799932929 …
-
-
That seems like the opposite of steel-manning. Is there any possible way for righties to express concern about ideological indoctrination, or do you map every possible expression of concern to "well OBVIOUSLY their TRUE concern is racism" ?
-
Because if the latter, then you've constructed an airtight ideological / epistemological bubble that forces you to ignore EVERYTHING from outside, because you already know the truth. ...which seems fairly totalitarian / anti-Enlightenment, no?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.