typical reddit/r/legaladvice post: "person X put their car / house / student loans / business in person Y's name, just as - you know - a <gestures> paperwork thing - but now creditors / the federal government / the DMV / the police / the IRS are acting as if this is Y's thing"
-
-
10/ This is a mystery. Perhaps some day I'll understand.
Show this thread -
11/ necro-posting to this thread because this is so relevanthttps://twitter.com/k_d_payne/status/1118985719157088256 …
Show this thread -
12/ "that's just as - you know - <gestures> a paperwork thing"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I've run a farm for 5 years, and I ran a business for 15 years before that. I think I have fairly few problems given 20 years and dozens and dozens and dozens of low wage employees. Also, I never tell stories about good employees. ("he did his job for three years, then quit")
- Show replies
-
-
-
To take a slightly different example, every company has email policies and no one takes them seriously. They're not meant to police how email is done. They're meant to provide a pretext to fire you if they need to.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think many people interpret "boilerplate contract language" as something like "this is just codifying the basic assumptions about how this interaction would go normally, so unless someone acts in bad faith it won't bind".
-
Which in the ideal, and most common, case is even true. But that's really not the same as "these terms don't count", which some people don't get.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That guy. SMDH
-
Just realized I have a mental bin with that guy and Very Bad Ranch Hand in it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.