Imagine the regulatory bans & liability suits if a for-profit business had made this product: "While nearly 5,000 people have successfully climbed [Mt. Everest], another 300 are thought to have died along the way."https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/as-mount-everest-glaciers-melt-dead-bodies-of-climbers-emerge/2019/03/29/ccb35d24-5167-11e9-8d28-f5149e5a2fda_story.html?utm_term=.e6104fbf4e7e …
I mean, there is a distinction here, I get it. ...but it seems like a very small / subtle one. I'm not saying "the manufacturer of the snow pants" is relevant here - is this not a "product" https://mountaintrip.com/international/himalaya/everest/ … or this? https://www.adventureconsultants.com/expeditions/seven-summits/everest/ … One flat fee...
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
sure. I'm an ancap. I want people to be allowed to take as much risk as they want. That's orthogonal to the topic being discussed (is/ought).
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.