Imagine the regulatory bans & liability suits if a for-profit business had made this product: "While nearly 5,000 people have successfully climbed [Mt. Everest], another 300 are thought to have died along the way."https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/as-mount-everest-glaciers-melt-dead-bodies-of-climbers-emerge/2019/03/29/ccb35d24-5167-11e9-8d28-f5149e5a2fda_story.html?utm_term=.e6104fbf4e7e …
-
-
Yes, but they didn't make the main product, they just advise you on how to use it.
-
I mean, there is a distinction here, I get it. ...but it seems like a very small / subtle one. I'm not saying "the manufacturer of the snow pants" is relevant here - is this not a "product" https://mountaintrip.com/international/himalaya/everest/ … or this? https://www.adventureconsultants.com/expeditions/seven-summits/everest/ … One flat fee...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
tfw you realize the universe is actually a profitable PPV business and we're all reality TV stars of varying popularity
-
this is
@LibertyFarmNH 's theory - Elon Musk is played by some rich trust fund kid who keeps using his dad's credit card to buy in-game results - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.