Meh. I'm in favor of harsh punishments for violating rules that are (a) just / fair, (b) very very easy to NOT violate. Read Friedman's Law's Order - have to multiply loss x prob of being caught. Harshness does not AT ALL invalidate "can't do time / don't do crime" logichttps://twitter.com/uppittynegress/status/1095023824658227202 …
-
-
See also Moldbug: "Every city in the world has the death penalty for stepping out in front of a bus. How to deal with this draconian law? By not violating it."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And then the ones who can’t pay end up in jail. So now tax payers are paying for that, plus police overtime to watch for litterers, plus the salaries of the court to prosecute the litterers. So we’ve wasted all this money in hopes 98% of litterers will just pay the fine?
-
yes, them going to jail is GOOD. You want to disincentivize theft.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.