Gary beat me to it. Yes, food to fuel seems like a poor approach. But sewage + seawater + sunshine to sugar via algae, then to alcohol via yeast, that’s a biofuel too. (With several ancillary benefits to humans and environment).https://twitter.com/garycdavison/status/1094452337844908038 …
OK. So am I correct in restarting your position as "pathways which do not use the same limited resources as food [ e.g. high quality crop land ] are better, because they do not create market rivalries for food (and thus do not raise the price of food)" ? Because that's my pos.
-
-
"restating" sigh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep. We seem to be agreeing. Possibly we should both be alarmed.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.