I think that the facial features are less interesting than the rise of an ethnic spoil system, the collapse of rule of law, and blatant and widespread corruption, but that's just me. https://twitter.com/sonyasupposedly/status/1086372344237412352 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @MorlockP
Can't say I really care what future generations will look like provided my principles are carried forward. If you care about looks over ideas, you're a racist, plain and simple. If you claim people who care about ideas really care about looks, you're intellectually dishonest.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VarminWay
I agree with then first sentence. If someone supports the Enlightenment, he's my tribe, no matter what his skin color. Thing is, it turns out that there are more pro liberty miniarchists, per capita, in Sweden than in Kenya.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
Sure. Absolutely. But that's a correlation, not a causation. Ideas can spread and wane in ways completely unrelated to biology. We can, in theory, end up with every white person being superstitious tribesmen and the Chinese having your current views.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VarminWay
Agreed! Not causation! Is there something I said that you disagree with, or is there something you SUSPECT I think that you disagree with?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP
You implicitly disagreed with my second sentence by only stating your agreement with my first, so clearly we disagree on SOMETHING.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VarminWay
By only addressing this topic and not once saying that killing children is wrong, you implicitly agree with the statement ... do you see how stupid deducing "implicit agreement" is? 2nd sentence is DERIVED from the first sentence, so there was no need to also agree to it.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP
Then there was no need to specify you were only agreeing to the first, as there? If I say two things and you agree with both, why type out 'the first'?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I already explained: the second is DERIVED from the first. IIRC there was a third sentence that did not derive.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.