Why? The free market does not consider a chimpanzee's skills to be sufficient to pay him enough to raise his family in a nice middle class house. Why should the free market necessarily consider a normie's skills sufficient? (I'm not asserting that they're not; fwiw)
well, OK, sure. Then we both agree that the market DOES reward chimps at a level that allows them to raise families. ...and that a truly free market would reward normies at a level that also allows them. If we both accept that $10k / yr might be such a level, we don't disagree