Infuriatingly they don't even list any evidence that might debunk him, they just cite to experts who say "he's probably wrong." Amusingly, a lot of comments on the article (by NY times readers!) Are pointing this disrepancy out.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He had no chance to salvage his reputation with these people. That's a total lie.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am honestly impressed with the number of non sequiturs and non-arguments here contained.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I love the quotes saying “look at these examples” as if the existence of outliers disproved statistical distributions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I dislike Watson as a person, but his scientific views are spot-on.
-
Until he uses his science to support eugenics
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.