or expressed an interest in a topic and been answered with a very large and mostly uncommented .bib file attachment
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Bingo. Generally in legal argumentation the weight of a particular rule is determined by how far back you can trace its history and use. Or, alternatively, the prestige of the Jurist who promulgated/formalized the rule. Rule that have been around for centuries usually win...
-
...even if there are theoretically 'better' rules available. If you're an activist Judge and hold a high enough position, you can toss out old rules and make up new ones. If others respect and use a new rule (citing back to its origin) it will stick.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As a lawyer who used to be an engineer: can confirm. BUT academic STEM has been going to same way for a while. Witness "scientists" who should know better pushing trendy but anti-factual climate, sex/gender, etc., garbage.
-
And once that filters down, beware the airplane designed by engineers who have gone thru politically-motivated vetting....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Techies only think they know what they're talking about, where are the citations?!" *program runs*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.