I think I know what you're trying to say, but your two examples of sex workers and pot heads as "WRONG" groups totally mystifies me. What does a self-described libertarian broadly find himself opposed to in these groups?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You'll criticize someone for something you've never tried firsthand?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't think that extrapolating my statement outside of it's intended realm makes for a useful argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"I will criticize those who do" Sounds to me like you're okay with a sort of undiscriminating blanket criticism of this act in general. Is this the case? Criticisms of one person — given knowledge of their circumstances and manner of use — is not unreasonable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
criticism of a class of thing is not unreasonable either.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
So in your view, is libertarianism merely an acknowledgement that legal prohibition of something like a psychoactive substance will backfire?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Thought Experiment: If you think that in every case act X will be detrimental [to it's user and nobody else, let's say], if it could be legally restricted perfectly and without side effect, should it be?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
libertarianism says "no"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.