sure, yes - but 60s animation seemed better? so, something changed, not sure what
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LibertyFarmNH @MorlockP and
relatedly, i think these stylistic choices train our mainstream animators to make ugly crap for undiscriminating consumers, while the really talented people go into video game development where quality seems to be a much higher priority
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LibertyFarmNH @mr_archenemy and
I always thought Michael Whelan was the best at fiction/fantasy cover art and then his own private work...such an appreciation for the human form. I cannot bear comics, never did understand their attraction but then I was an Archie era reader so... https://www.michaelwhelan.com/
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LibertyFarmNH @SpookyDudeH8er and
looking at these guys, they seem a bit like 19th american landscape painters
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LibertyFarmNH @mr_archenemy and
Another thought: In 1200 AD the country was wild and scary. In the 1970s, it wasn't...but we were in living memory of it being so. Westerns, etc. made deserts and flash floods and mountains seem real and harsh. Arguably kids in 1990s + never got that, so their pix are pastoral
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @LibertyFarmNH and
well, those things are still harsh, out west. but yeah, nobody out here reads zane grey anymore, i guess
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
had me at "nobody reads"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.