Every time I examine the evidence of evolving from a common ancestry the case falls apart from the lies of those pushing it. I have yet to hear a convincing case that does not rely on assuming micro evolution means macro evolution must be true.
-
-
The exclusion of birds (or all non-mammalian amniotes) is particularly odd, given the inclusion of fish.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.