Any argument that doesn't discuss Type I errors and Type II errors, and disclose the n and the p in the studies isn't an argument; it's just chanting tribal slogans Related: there are basically zero arguments, pro or con, out there. Two groups of monkeys chanting is exhausting.https://twitter.com/voxdotcom/status/1054412075483701248 …
-
-
If you haven't already, read up on Dr Ken Zucker and his recent winning lawsuit against CAMH in Toronto. He's one of the few who actually cared about the science when working with gender dysphoric children:https://nationalpost.com/news/camh-reaches-settlement-with-former-head-of-gender-identity-clinic …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.