yeah, the full blow 19th c. phrenology was 95% bunk...but it's a sore spot. I first got black pilled in HS when a teacher (a) explained the scientific method, (b) said that phrenology was bunk. I asked "what experiment proved that?" A: "well, it's OBVIOUSLY bunk" https://twitter.com/BookDude/status/1034809594554589184 …
"reasonable to conclude that its obvious bunkness" what "obvious bunkness" ?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
the former
End of conversation
-
-
-
Point conceded. You do on occasion seem to defend phrenology as if it were valid, rather than merely an instance where one of your high school teachers was insufficiently rigorous in a discussion with one of his brightest students.
-
ok, valid request for clarification there are two different timestamps / two different stories in 9th grade I merely asserted "you have not proved it pro or con" in 2018 I assert "there have since been studies that prove some aspects of it"
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.