yeah, the full blow 19th c. phrenology was 95% bunk...but it's a sore spot. I first got black pilled in HS when a teacher (a) explained the scientific method, (b) said that phrenology was bunk. I asked "what experiment proved that?" A: "well, it's OBVIOUSLY bunk" https://twitter.com/BookDude/status/1034809594554589184 …
-
-
I found James Burnham's expounding on this topic really insightfulhttps://twitter.com/wraithburn/status/1034081706293305344 …
-
The last bit is the real meathttps://twitter.com/wraithburn/status/1034081709925588998 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thing is, most still have problems conceiving of generalizations and statistics on even a basic level. "Most abdominal scars are from c-sections and appendectomies" "HA! This person had their gallbladder removed, your theory is debunked!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.