"if you refuse to ____ " is an SJW tell. There you were, existing, having a quiet preference for apples over oranges, and then I barge in and say "if you REFUSE to admit that oranges are superior then ___" >>>
my argumentation style is straight on nerd tank. In chess it would be the rook. "I think X. We agree on axiom Y. I advance from a1 to a2, with argument A. I advance from a2 to a3 with argument B. I advance from a3 to a4 with argument C. ... checkmate."
-
-
these SJW tactics are sneak bishop attacks. From out of nowhere you're placed under attack. Your attacked isn't even adjacent. What the hell is going on?!?
-
for more on the parent/child framing, check out Games People Play, recommended to me by
@maradydd
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.